Ethics and Values Essay Sample free essay sample

â€Å"Consciously or unconsciously. societal work thought is. for the most portion. sympathetic with the useful manners of idea in that the work of a policy or action is measured against its inclination to bring forth ‘good’ consequences. † ( Wilkes 1981. p. 63 ) In this essay I will be discoursing the ethical quandary that may happen in a societal work puting. as a pupil societal worker. I will look at the deductions they may keep with respects to rescue of services. and co-working relationships. Social work is about way it’s based on societal attention professionals being advocators for persons or groups of whom they work with in society. whilst supplying services and advancing independency. As with any occupation societal work has rigorous policies. protocols. guidelines. and procedures that the worker has to adhere to. In theory this is a logical investing for guaranting good working pattern. nevertheless in world these processs frequently go against the positions. sentiments and rights of the service user. This can do struggle between the worker’s personal values and professional committedness. as a worker you are bound to your work by legal responsibilities failure to follow with legal models can hold terrible deductions that can impact the service being provided. Whereas personally you will turn to responsibilities on a morality degree dictating or changing your determination because of grounds such as common land moreover making limitations or barriers for the service user and administration. During research for this instance survey I have identified legion legislative paperss that can be used within this scenario nevertheless I will chiefly be mentioning to the Human Rights Act 1998 as this act it states that there should be no favoritism with respects to obtaining entree to services on evidences of disablement. the right to get married or hold a household. and that cultural and lingual differences should be taken into history in the proviso and bringing of services. This could be used in concurrence with the safeguarding of vulnerable groups act 2006 and the children’s act 1989. Government guidelines suggest that persons with disablements should be given aid to back up their households and parental functions. In this instance the service user is CS of a Black British nationality. 36 old ages old and has a immature household with kids aged 4. 10 and 14. her spouse CB is 38. CS has an unwellness known as hydrocephaly which is fluid on the encephalon. henceforth the cause for concern and possible demand for intercession. Recently it has come to illume that CS has been losing ability in her cognitive and physical maps. although she needs aid she is declining intercession due to fear of losing her kids. The GSCC Personal Cultural Social theoretical account should be used to find any external issues or lending factors justifying farther demand. Personal factors identified are the loss of responsible responsibilities to her kids. loss of bodily maps and her overall physical. emotional and mental province. Options such Person Centred Planning or household mediation should be made available to CS as a agency of intervention and recovery. Social differences will be an country that CS and her household may necessitate support with as there is an incompatibility of societal interaction. Power kineticss between the dominant and dominated societal groups within our communities might be act uponing the children’s or even CS’s perceptual experience this may be why CS is going isolated. Research suggests the major causes for divisions country associated in footings of race. gender. category. sexual penchant. disablement and age. Within the household there are assorted obstructions that can be speculated as being the important factor in CS impairment in wellness. since the unwellness on her encephalon has non been classified as a mental unwellness as yet farther probe is required to find whether CS has any legal rights under the Mental Health Act 2007. In regard to cultural positions CS could be experiencing discerning due to the fact that authoritive figures like the societal services are frowned upon within cultural minority groups. it is deemed as a dishonour to hold engagement as the stigma attached to these services are that the female parent or the household can non get by. â€Å"Ethnic individuality Fosters pride in one’s group. making a sense of humanity. self-respect. self-respect and proper position. † ( Lum 2004 pg. 79 ) This nevertheless identifies an ethical quandary for me as the pupil societal worker because looking at the overall facts of the instance it is clear that CS is in precedence demand of being assessed and having support. efficaciously this is good for the whole household despite it being opposite to what CS wants. However it could besides be questioned that the referral procedure could hold been delayed until elucidation on CS basic demands were made known. as she is now feels betrayed and is non in understanding with the full appraisal procedure. It is indispensable for me to affect CS and promote her to be proactive in determination devising. whilst maintaining her aware of any effects for all action taken. If CS loses complete assurance in the services this could hold deductions on the response and resonance between service supplier and CS. In this retrospect I can see how societal work values coincide with useful rules. for case harmonizing to regulation of utilitarianism â€Å"The right action is that which produces the greatest balance of good over evil ( the rule of public-service corporation ) † Banks: 2006. pg. 36 ( The Greatest Happiness Principle )â€Å"We ought to make that which produces the greatest sum of felicity for the greatest figure of people. † This signifies the demand to reenforce interventional methods to back up CS and her household as it would profit the bulk. back uping the societal workers action of traveling in front with the referral. Harmonizing to Banks ( 2006 ) . Kantian positions of rights refers to the â€Å"ends non means† theory. ( absolute universal ) or qualified cosmopolitan which refers to all persons holding human rights with exclusions. Although I feel that there should be methods or schemes in topographic point to assist back up her want it could be argued that a Utilitarian attack would non be the best suggestion or method to utilize. as it would intend potentially seting everyone else at hazard merely to follow with what CS requested nevertheless service suppliers use portion of Kantians qualified cosmopolitan theory which is why her positions are being overlooked to a grade. Overall it would look that societal work values stem from both Kantian and Utilitarian theories. Article 8 of the Human Rights Act states that a individual has the right to esteem for private household life – the province can merely interfere in the household life if it is necessary for the protection of others. e. g. kids. When looking at rights I understand them as being exercised as a legal duty or an entitlement to hold or make something. these are implemented by the HRA 1998 which is a legal edge policy that stipulates each individual’s right to an ideological balanced life style. Harmonizing to Banks ( 2006 pg. 104 ) : rights are a wide term that refers â€Å"to a scope of claims. autonomies. powers and relationships. † I would trust on the British Association Social Work and General Social Care Council to happen the best schemes to accommodate the demands of the household on a whole. the kids may non be in absolute danger as CB is proactive in guaranting they attend school likewise conveying them place from school at the terminal of the twenty-four hours. This is non to propose nevertheless that he is as proactive outside of these responsibilities. or even that the kids are come oning good plenty in their surveies. These unknown countries may be of concern and should be addressed utilizing the common appraisal model ; this is used under the Every Child Matters- kids act 2004. The CAF is used to measure possible hazard or necessitate it aims to place the demands and strengths of a kid from a holistic point of view whilst as societal work practicians. we have a moral. ethical and legal responsibility to dispute inequality and promote chances henceforth choosing for the most effectual method for run intoing any demands identified. The children’s wellbeing is a precedence nevertheless being that CS has a spouse who contributes. her wellbeing is overriding as without aid her unwellness may deteriorate which on the whole could set greater strain on the household and do the kids more hurt than they may already be sing. â€Å"According to Symonides ( 2008 ) â€Å"The province can supply support to help parents with their responsibilities where necessary. † Section 18 of the Convention of the Rights of Children Activities such as after school nines or play strategies can maintain the kids stimulated and liberate up some lone quality clip for CB. if he is the exclusive primary attention giver for CS. they can both profit from some clip apart to part-take in some single discriminatory activities. Since the societal worker I confided in appeared to demo no empathy or involvement for CS’s overall wellbeing I found myself confronting yet another quandary. unlike before this issue is a professional struggle with respects to how I go about taking the following measure. make I â€Å"go over her head† or do an effort to ground with her once more. my concerns about her unsympathetic attitude was besides an issue I feel strongly needs to be addressed. This societal work professional was non advancing any life opportunities and chances for CS which is in fact oppressive pattern. in the sense that she was non esteeming CS individual’s rights or her wants because the attention support she felt she needed were being disregarded these can addressed under The General Social Care Council. in exercising of its powers under subdivisions 59 ( 1 ) . 59 ( 2 ) . 59 ( 3 ) . and 71 ( 1 ) of the Care Standards Act 2000. and of all other powers enabling the Council in that behalf. and with the consent of the Secretary of State. hereby makes the undermentioned Rules: hypertext transfer protocol: //www. gscc. org. United Kingdom. The key and cardinal rules to disputing oppressive pattern and advancing AOP ( Anti Oppressive Practice ) is to hold non merely self-awareness but an consciousness of others. holding the willingness to larn and a uninterrupted desire to accomplish greater self-reformation. On a personal degree I truly experience that CS demands are paramount and that she should be put frontward for some societal attention support. and that the instance should be approached and addressed in a holistic position to guarantee an appropriate result is achieved. Professionally the legal facets of the workplace are making limitations. on one manus HRA 1998 and DDA 2005 it stipulates she has a right to hold a household despite her disablement. yet on the other because she now needs support the children’s demands have become paramount over hers. These guidelines have been set in topographic point by BASW and it is just to propose that in this instance the codifications of moralss are non applicable for the overall protection and rights of the service user. I decide to force for an appraisal to be made so that CS can have her attention bundle. this is strictly because she is cognizant of her inabilities at present and she has taken safeguards to guarantee that the kids are safe and healthy. As the cause for CS unwellness is non concrete it will be complex to decode what disablement act it may come under. although the Disability Rights Commission act 1999 is a legal frame that can use to CS and her state of affairs. Alternatively this is where interagency engagement is paramount. deficiency of both information and communicating can further detain the application procedure. I will back up my application for the petition of a attention bundle by recommending for CS. this is my justified right or single responsibility as a societal work professional. Each single life has echt worth hence everyone should hold the right to well-being. self-realization and independency of control over their ain picks in life. As an advocator I should supply CS and her household with all the information needed to help them with happening solutions to run into their demands. this includes doing certain they are cognizant of the ailments process and doing it accessible for them if they wish to utilize it. Guaranting to do referrals to relevant services that can help the household with their demands where my administration is unable to supply resources every bit good as build CS’s assurance in the section. Although from the bureaus perspective my rawness within the profession could be seen as invalid or misleading. whereas the appointed societal worker for the household is moving upon the information given whilst continuing safeguarding issues refering the kids. Section 17 of the Children’s Act ( 1989 ) stipulates that â€Å"A kid will be offered support if a child’s wellness and development may endure. or if they are likely to come to harm without services† . World Wide Web. cpsi. gov. uk ( 17/3/2011 ) It is just to hold that that societal work theory derives from psychological and sociological positions. which chiefly reverts back to societal relationships and larning how others within society think and live. This in my sentiment is the footing and foundation of empathy towards others which is a cardinal cardinal component in societal work pattern. placing how the service user is experiencing within their state of affairs will order how you choose to turn to and back up their demands. Legislative paperss nevertheless can ever antagonize and change or curtail the degree of aid that is provided to a service user at any given clip. Article 8 of the Human Rights Act ( 1998 ) the right to esteem for household and private life. it states that local governments should seek to guarantee that any actions taken does non impact this right ( unless to protect the rights of others. ) hypertext transfer protocol: //www. hmso. gov. uk/acts/acts1998/19980042. htm ( 15/4/2011 ) To summarize Social work pattern requires the worker to keep a degree of consciousness about their ain values. biass. ethical issues or quandaries and any struggles of involvement that may hold an impact or terrible reverberations on the manner they carry out their pattern. The GSCC 2002 stipulates that in order to advance good working pattern you must value. regard and recognize the diverseness of others whilst disputing any signifiers of favoritism ensuing in inequality or unfairness. Anti-Oppressive Practice is linked to ADP but focuses on the power kineticss and instabilities between the service user and the worker. The societal worker must be cognizant of these instabilities earlier. during and after pattern. and should utilize all resources. cognition and accomplishments available to portion the power and degree out the kineticss to an equal balance. This once more links back to contemplation and being a brooding scholar as the thought procedure of how to supply a full service in a mode that the service user is satisfied with will already be evident. an lineation of the service users needs disfavors and experiences will be cardinal in guaranting the execution of accurate resources. Mention and bibliography Banks. S. ( 2006 ) . Ethical motives and Valuess in Social Work ( 3rd edition ) Palgrave Macmillan. UK World Wide Web. cspi. gov. uk accessed: ( 17/3/2011 )World Wide Web. gscc. org. uk accessed: ( 2/5/2011 )hypertext transfer protocol: //www. hmso. gov. uk/acts/acts1998/19980042. htm accessed: ( 15/4/2011 ) hypertext transfer protocol: //www. dh. gov. uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Legislation/Actsandbills/index. htm accessed: ( 8/3/2011 ) Lum. D. ( 2004 ) . Social Work and people of coloring material: A procedure phase attack. Brooks/Cole- Thompson Learning. University of Michigan. USA MacKinnon. B. ( 1998 ) Ethical motives: Theory and Contemporary Issues: Second Edition. Wadsworth Press Thompson. N ( 2006 )